The Evidence People
The Blog
Coaching IS leadership in multi-school groups
June is conference season in education, and don’t I know it!
Introduction
Is the Developing Great Teaching systematic review a cornerstone in an edifice of error, a key component of a mistaken ‘consensus’ around the evidence about effective teacher professional development and learning?
This is what Harry Fletcher-Wood Sam Sims assert in their piece in the TES on 21st September – [on-line here] and their more detailed article.
How purpose shapes the significance of systematic reviews for different education stakeholders
- Philippa Cordingley – Chief Executive CUREE
- Paul Crisp – Managing Director
- Steve Higgins – Professor of Education Durham University
We are planning a barbeque in our new house next weekend and we want to know if it’s going to rain. We look at the weather forecast and it tells us there’s a 25% chance of rain.
That’s no good to us – we want to know will it will rain, yes or no?
I’ve been thinking a lot about our attitudes to subject knowledge and teacher preparation and CPD in England recently;
not least as a member of the OECD Expert Group carrying out country reviews of the quality of provision. While preparing for a conference in Tokyo where we will read across all of the nine completed country reviews, I was struck by the very significant contrast between the UK approach and practices in most other countries. I think we have a lot to learn as well as a lot to offer other counties.