The National Teacher Research Panel was set up about 15 years ago by CUREE supported by a group of national education agencies most of which no longer exist. It had three main goals:
- To ensure that all research in education takes account of the teacher perspective
- To ensure a higher profile for research and evidence informed practice in government, academic and practitioner communities
- To increase the number of teachers engaged in and with the full spectrum of research activity.
Over the several years of its existence, the Panel, supported by its expert advisers in CUREE, has helped and encouraged dozens of teachers and school leaders to do high quality but practical research. The Panel also helped them report their findings succinctly, in plain English and focused on relevance to other practitioners. This is one such example of that work.
Talk is a teacher's prime teaching tool, but how many of us stop to plan or analyse what we say, or think about how it affects pupil learning? This research summary features a project* that examined in detail how teachers use talk to promote meaningful learning in science. The researchers analysed the interactions between 12 teachers (six primary and six secondary) and their pupils in science lessons to find out what strategic use of talk in teaching (often called 'dialogic teaching') looked like in science. They found that science teachers needed to use different kinds of talk to enable pupils to move from their existing everyday understanding of natural phenomena towards a scientific view. These included 'dialogic' episodes when teachers probed pupils' everyday ideas and 'authoritative' episodes when the teacher introduced scientific ideas. Sometimes the talk was interactive and sometimes it was not. The skill lay in making the right choices at the right time.The researchers worked in both primary and secondary classrooms so they could compare challenges and approaches to dialogic teaching in both settings. For example, although primary school teachers sometimes worked at the limit of their subject knowledge, they were more likely than secondary science teachers to focus on dialogue. The researchers felt that this was due to the wider remit they had for pupils' learning, which included 'speaking and listening' as well as science.The analyses of classroom talk, example dialogues and suggested approaches for promoting classroom talk that are presented in this research summary will help both primary and secondary science teachers to consider how they could develop their use of talk in the classroom in ways that will promote meaningful learning.
File attachments:
Download Effective classroom talk in science.pdf (172.78 KB)
Document section: